What is strongly supported: Cullin neddylation changes CRL conformation and promotes ubiquitin transfer; deneddylation by COP9 signalosome resets CRLs; NAE inhibitors validate pathway importance.
What is context-dependent: NEDD8 can modify non-cullin substrates in some contexts, but cullins dominate canonical biology.
What is weak, controversial, or assay-biased: Treating neddylation as a general degradation route would be wrong; graph avoids this well.
What may be duplicate biology under another name: Overlaps with ROUTER.
Missing or excessive graph structure
Missing edges: Add LICENSE <-> SWITCH? CRL activation can be phosphorylation-regulated, but not necessary.
Excess edges: None major.
Candidate splits: No split.
Candidate merges: Could merge into ROUTER for a simpler map, but keeping it highlights CRL regulation.
Candidate renames: NEDD8-CRL.
Recommendation
Concrete graph change, if any: Keep as narrow upstream switch for ROUTER.
Concrete technical-notes/blog wording change, if any: Mirror the graph recommendation in the glossary and relation catalogue, and explicitly mark the confidence/caveat where the claim is context-dependent or assay-sensitive.
Key sources
PMID 24466314 — neddylation and CRL regulation review.
PMID 29686390 — structural/mechanistic review of CRL activation by NEDD8.
PMID 33127844 — neddylation in cancer/therapeutic targeting review.
PMID 32424077 — COP9 signalosome deneddylation and CRL cycling review.